socialmedicine.org

GENERAL
META
HTML
LINK ANALYSIS
SERVER
IP

Socialmedicine.org recives any estimated n/a unique visitors and n/a unique page views per day. Revenue gained from these much visits may be n/a per day from various advertising sources. The estimated worth of site is n/a.

Website Age n/a
Alexa Rank no-data
Country United States
IP Address 173.254.104.55

META INFORMATION

Title

ALAMES: Latin American Social Medicine Asociation

Description

An Alternative to Corporate Health

Keywords

Content Type

utf-8

No	Meta Name	Value
1	robots	index, follow

GENERAL HTML INFORMATION

Type	Status
HTML 5
Responsive Website

HTML SIZE INFORMATION

Text / Code Ratio 58.56 %

socialmedicine.org has a website text/code ratio of 58.56 %. Search engine crawlers tend to not pick up pages with inadequate content.

IMPORTANT HTML TAGS AND COUNTS

Titles

H11
H25
H310
H40
H50
H60

No	Text
1	Alames: latin american social medicine asociation

No	Text
1	Doctors for the 99%: medical solidarity with occupy wall street
2	Meta (2)
3	Tags
4	Random links

No	Text
1	What complıcates our human rıghts work ıs the lack of ınformatıon we have as relates to hıdden, semı-hıdden or false truths.
2	Spontaneous socıal movements are ıncreasıngly and freely movıng ın the dırectıon of human rıghts.
3	ın polıtıcs, everythıng boıls down to knowıng who wıelds power wıth what purpose and ın the benefıt of whom. (louis casado)
4	For human rıghts, ımproved terms of trade are more ımportant than foreıgn aıd.
5	There ıs no pursuıt of a common good ın current development trends.
6	ıt seems the tıme ıs overdue for the nutrıtıon professıon to stand back and examıne ıts worldwıde work dıspa***ıonately. (part 2 of 2)
7	The tıme ıs overdue for the nutrıtıon professıon to stand back and examıne ıts worldwıde work dıspa***ıonately. (part 1 of 2)
8	Polıtıcal forces cannot be fought wıth morals and technıcal fıxes. actıng polıtıcally ıs the way to reach ground zero ın human rıghts work.
9	What do partıc****tıon-ın and representatıon-of look lıke when of a bındıng character?
10	Let us, once and for all, talk tough about development: development wıll never be achıeved from the ımpulse of the ‘free’ market! (#) (daniel pizarro)

Text Styling

STRONG731
B0
EM28
I0
U45
CITE0

STRONG

No	Text
1	Before any truth, there is a judgment that is not objective
2	truths are fabrications of power
3	power (2)
4	imposes ‘truth’ as a means of control
5	Fake news demonize today’s youth
6	The market has emerged as the source of truths
7	The view from statistics
8	Do we (you) get involved in the repet**ive collection of some irrelevant data?
9	Statistics
10	shape cultures
11	have become crucial
12	development tools
13	often used unknowingly by development experts to further entrench the Northern development discourse
14	statistics are political technologies that
15	translate into truth
16	technocracy has conveniently forgotten human and nature’s rights
17	technocrats (mis)lead us
18	ignoring
19	HR (2)
20	A sub-view from Big Data
21	Big data are becoming an instrument of psycho-political control
22	the corporation
23	its ma*ive acc*ulation of data
24	Social movements need to
25	act! (2)
26	Algorithmic Injustice
27	Algorithmic decision-making
28	being deployed in
29	social domains
30	working behind the scenes
31	what responsibilities and obligations do we bear
32	? (22)
33	Algorithms can purportedly avoid biased decision making
34	the use of AI systems often replicates historical and contemporary conditions of injustice
35	Algorithmic systems are simply not neutral
36	need watchdog groups
37	to monitor
38	machine learning
39	Algorithms
40	creating a pernicious and worrisome feedback loop in which social injustice is not only replicated but, in fact, further entrenched.
41	these systems continue to perpetuate those very conditions under the guise of neutrality.
42	society as a whole
43	to ask the deeper ex-ante questions, e.g., should we even use weak AI in the social domain at all?
44	algorithmic decision making will continue to entrench social injustice
45	The view from the social media
46	internet
47	the loudest voices prevail
48	not giving enough (or any) time to think about humankind, HR and nature
49	subst**uted debate with insult and fake news
50	‘persuasion-and-manip****tion-media.
51	we loose so much time dealing with the branches to evade what is really important
52	social media are too often but an echo chamber of half truths
53	We cannot be caught off guard in the battle for a ‘market share’ of the public mind
54	give HR a better chance in the super highway
55	The view from journalism
56	Reporting has given way to opinion
57	opinion becomes certainty
58	freedom of expression
59	The ‘great dis-informers’ of the public opinion
60	devoted to defend the status-quo
61	Journalism
62	has become cheap currency
63	It s thus urgent to change this state of affairs
64	our collective views easily become ‘invented memory’
65	the judicial system
66	fails the HR of those rendered poor
67	(HR) activists; the challenge is to link them
68	the HR movement opposes the neoliberal approaches in place and
69	shares the same strategic enemy
70	Collective action is indispensible
71	for keeping HR
72	at the very forefront
73	a tall order
74	activists (3)
75	determine whether
76	HR are having an actual impact
77	the content ought not only to be aspirational, but mobilizing
78	The HR community
79	provides the perfect platform
80	If HR activists believe that such networking is utopian
81	they should
82	say so
83	The discussion on HR activism’s contents must depart from
84	acknowledging that
85	the powerless cannot do much
86	In many cases the powerful actually exploit the powerless, particularly because claim holders are not broadly
87	mobilized
88	There is not much value in a coalition of organizations and militants who meet merely to discuss among themselves though…
89	They treat us as ‘opiniologists’
90	A couple caveats here:
91	Too often, the aim is clear, but
92	The last thing a HR activist should loose
93	A word of caution for activists:
94	And then, there are the scholars in the human rights movement
95	When scholars***p and activism compete
96	Scholars*p will have limited influence if it is restricted to cla*rooms and professional journals
97	and/or conferences
98	need
99	action-oriented keynote speakers
100	The world is run by the people who show up!
101	‘do or perish’
102	Go to the people!
103	Bottom line here then is:
104	By definition, one cannot empower someone else! Claim holders have to do it by themselves
105	Power cannot be given
106	Empowerment is at once a personal and a group process
107	claim holders cannot depend on someone doing something for them
108	A lot of opening of minds will be needed
109	people to dig deeper into their emotions to hold onto their views.
110	little
111	can be achieved by bombarding
112	with
113	‘facts’
114	old and new wisdom mix admirably
115	To tell someone they are wrong, first tell them they are right”:
116	we must take note from what side s/he views the matter
117	admit that truth to them, but also reveal to them the side on which their perception is false
118	no one likes to be mistaken
119	I am a ‘possibilist’
120	got to pull together
121	Choose people in your life who are gutsier than you
122	There are three cla***es of people
123	a) (6)
124	b) (6)
125	c) (6)
126	More foot soldiers, not only a few generals
127	Do not underestimate:
128	Most people
129	Experience shows
130	Finally
131	One national public interest CSO ought to act as an umbrella HR organization
132	giving other CSOs novel ideas
133	brings members to a common ground
134	In the cla*** from which most of us come from, overriding emphasis is placed on preserving the status-quo
135	particular interests of a certain social cla***
136	impose them as if they were the interests of society as a whole
137	domination intentions
138	laws
139	nothing but the expression of
140	the dominant group
141	Changing the const**ution is
142	a political issue
143	Political economy is
144	we cannot thus look at political actors
145	without looking at their
146	cla***
147	Their ident**y is always embedded in a
148	political framework
149	corruption
150	“If you pay peanuts you get monkeys; if you pay truffles you get pigs”.
151	A great majority of people
152	have long stored-up deep feelings of
153	oppression
154	stem from defeats
155	suffered
156	in a cla*** hierarchy
157	Our current day drama centers around the fact that while domination is exerted in an articulated way, the forces of resistance are fragmented
158	And how many anti-racist movements and organizations were not, at some point, s***ist and pro-capitalist?
159	As long as
160	fragmented resistance is maintained, it will not be possible to leave the capitalist
161	h****
162	a***ess if those critiques have contributed or not to even further deepen the fragmentation
163	find the angle
164	that does not give the forces of the Right
165	more
166	weapons to increase their
167	attack
168	there is a dialectical relations***p
169	we have to build on
170	Perceived anarchy
171	not about chaos
172	The problem with political jokes is they get elected
173	Does voting make any sense?
174	While people vote
175	it is not just the economy that influences them: “It is inequality, stupid”, it is the violation of HR
176	that will be what will hopefully mobilize young people to vote
177	I am left with a few questions here
178	slow re-politization
179	claim holders breaking the silence
180	economic and intellectual liberation of claim holder
181	politically conscious scholars
182	Does anything of substance change
183	The human rights struggle is about turning human suffering into history rather than destiny
184	Our approach must be political
185	governments
186	embarra*** them!
187	Will it be
188	the street
189	where we will find the essential truths? Who defines the stage where the game against neoliberalism with its HR violations will be played?
190	It will most probably neither be
191	philosophers nor us
192	who will define the stage
193	The stage will be set by a ma*** movement
194	that will
195	struggle in the squares and the streets
196	Injustice and violence always comes from above
197	times when national sovereignty
198	hiding grave suffering and HR violations
199	We are thus called to fight same-wars-in-different-fronts
200	urgent
201	World elites have already joined forces
202	In the struggle for limited resources, who has more chances? The more organized
203	Bottom line:
204	defined political and economic objectives. …Do you have such?
205	“Tell me what you presume to be and I will tell you what you are not”
206	HR workers envision what can be… How much slow progress can we all tolerate?
207	Postscript/Marginalia (6)
208	Marx has died. But Marx resuscitates annually
209	– (2)
210	he was a committed democrat
211	no thinker should be treated as a fixed repository of ‘the truth’. Instead, Marx’s writings are an important resource to fall back-on.
212	For him, the excess power of the executive branch was dangerous
213	bureaucrats
214	‘a cast’, ‘an army of parasites’ and ‘a cla*** of boot leakers’
215	It is thus imperative to him to replace the machinery of the state controlled by the dominant cla***es
216	a radical political transformation.
217	-The use of religion by the right wing
218	hate against gender equality, against LGTBs, against abortion, against immigrants.
219	Never forget: Much of external funding (deceptively called ‘foreign aid’) is spent on goods and expertise imported from the North
220	External funders are good at
221	‘paying for things’
222	development a***istance(?) has been a combination of money and ideas
223	imposed on the South
224	offering simplistic and politically neutral solutions
225	wither human rights
226	External funding cannot transform anti-democratic structures of power.
227	gives the elites a greater stake
228	contributes to increased powerlessness of the rendered poor
229	In short:
230	its objectives are strategic rather than humanitarian. Local elites
231	strengthen their hold on power
232	food aid
233	treats the symptoms of poverty, not its causes
234	Ponder
235	Has the time come for recipient countries to impose reverse conditionalities?
236	we must keep our eyes constantly open
237	this funding
238	purporting to ‘aid’
239	Procrastination
240	is the lifeblood of the status-quo
241	this also calls for fighting for a more democratic governance at the international level
242	Global governance is a broad concept relating to (regulating?) the functioning of international inst**utions generally
243	Global governance
244	depends on it being accepted by a majority
245	But it is a political myth
246	the representativeness of global governance a myth
247	The myth continues with a***uming there is such a thing as all global civil society backing global governance.
248	useful
249	for wide public consumption
250	the lack of a global antagonist
251	the
252	idea that CSOs are the transmission belt from-the-local-to-the-global
253	is really larger than life
254	it lends a fake legitimacy
255	collective deaf-to-gra***roots-claim-holders-demands
256	Selected CSOs have become willing partic****nts and have thus perpetuated the myth.
257	only some CSOs are included in a meeting and others are left out for opaque reasons
258	CSO partic****tion too often depoliticizes global governance.
259	likely to be coopted and tamed
260	–wither HR.
261	This all challenges how we think about the so-called ‘CSO-community’
262	Global governance fora have thus reinforced exclusionary practices fostering power hierarchies within civil society
263	CSOs
264	reproduce the North-South divide
265	not routinely serving as oppositional or corrective forces
266	the mythical narrative remains unchallenged.
267	–wither HR
268	Response to an article written by the internationally known scientist John Scales Avery for the Transcend Media Service
269	Government and corporate policies
270	determining
271	human rights (HR) policy
272	impact of this relations***p
273	craving for profit
274	characterizes development policy making
275	technologies: they are not neutral
276	private foreign investment
277	served the needs of a rich elite
278	Socially and HR appropriate technology does exist! It:
279	a) will
280	d)
281	e)
282	common good
283	is
284	reached when the private interest
285	is subordinated to the public interest
286	unrestrained pursuit of profit of the 1%
287	violence of big corporations and individuals against the 99%.
288	There is no common good
289	when TNCs capture politicians
290	this ‘politico-enterprise corruption’ has also now crossed over to men in uniform
291	economic development
292	meant applying directed-social-transformation-measures
293	If only we can demonetize the goals of development
294	social gain can indeed justify economic costs
295	Linking current development indicators to gains in GDP
296	Deterministic development vs sustainable development
297	The role of international organizations in development will remain modest
298	reflects the priorities and goals of the countries rendered rich
299	development (2)
300	legitimizes or delegitimizes (mostly) knowledge
301	proposed by claim holders.
302	Do not be fooled:
303	It is non-technical conflicts that have impeded long-term disparity reduction.
304	take home message
305	The
306	United Nations was built on a concept of sustainable development that is exactly the opposite of globalization
307	UN
308	concept
309	everybody taking part in it was going to be more
310	in
311	globalization
312	everybody would have more
313	Just ponder:
314	alternative of social protection
315	a ‘new social contract’ is what is now being called
316	Beware: (2)
317	Bottom line (4)
318	Any policy has three components
319	Human rights have, at best, been over-studied and under-acted upon.
320	We have too often tended to mistake endless negotiations on HR for action
321	false premise …false promises
322	development failure is measured in continued marginalization, misery and death
323	the changes to push
324	will only come from an organized pop****r movement
325	global in scope
326	dispel a myth:
327	Eleven Sins Against Humanity (and against HR)
328	As used today, the Food Systems concept is a non-political attempt to make issues technical
329	The UN
330	propagating a disappointingly narrow interpretation of what nutrition actions
331	are supposed to be
332	exclude claim holders
333	persistent attempt by governments to secure cheap food for the pop****tion. Cheap food is required to keep salaries low
334	neglect of the hidden costs of producing
335	deterioration of the environment
336	social costs born by farmers and fisherfolks
337	difficult to think out-of-the-box
338	those who succeed
339	considered
340	important elements
341	quietly eliminated from the discussion
342	regulations that are adapted to industrial ma*** production
343	resistance against any change
344	‘Big Data’ operators will become the new bosses of our food system.
345	requires us to (re)act
346	profound changes
347	resistance is to be expected from powerful groups
348	revolution of
349	behaviors is what is required
350	extremely challenging
351	At the end of the food system are the consumers of the wrong processed foods
352	we are under the spell of The Nutrition Triple Profit Cycle
353	We cannot have the food sector killing us.
354	big companies
355	produce junk food
356	that leads to NCDs
357	they
358	say: “It is not our responsibility”
359	actions that will be needed
360	production processes
361	supply chains
362	Are the companies good corporate citizen?
363	The role of science and technology is, in fact, peripheral to solving the problems of malnutrition in the world
364	2013 Lancet series of papers on nutrition made it clear we must adhere to the ‘technical coherence’
365	at the cost of
366	excluding research
367	that does not fit
368	dominant paradigm
369	science builds on a***umptions about what are legitimate domains of study
370	current practices
371	propagate a narrow, private sector-influenced interpretation of what nutrition means.
372	inherent biases
373	struggle with
374	human rights (HR) issues
375	removes the context
376	of non-technical social or political actions
377	Take nutrition education:
378	Malnutrition has thus been removed from the realm of the ethical and political
379	consciously framing nutrition in terms of the-dominant-development-discourses-of-the-day
380	limits the things that-we-are-able-to-do
381	Rendering an issue technical eventually leads to designated experts being the only people accredited to talk about it with authority
382	basic and structural causes
383	being relegated to the back burner
384	The UNICEF conceptual framework
385	widened the nutritionists’ horizon
386	the ‘rendering technical’ of complex
387	processes
388	nutrition scientists as an interest group too often take a technical stance
389	rather than focusing research on ways to reorganize the power relations
390	purely technocratic cures
391	minimal inconvenience to the haves of the world
392	‘policy inertia’
393	in tackling any of the three components of the so-called Global Syndemic
394	inadequate political leaders***p and governance
395	as well as the lack of unequivocal demand for policy action by claim holders, combined with strong opposition to those policies by powerful commercial interests.
396	the ones that would lose most
397	transnational corporations
398	It is not enough to react to hunger; we need to prevent it (
399	The generation of those who are born today does not wait
400	Hunger is a stranger to most of you and me
401	inefficient use of resources
402	Hunger entails four emotions:
403	People rendered poor have known hunger since the dawn of history
404	man
405	condemned to starve by the indifference of others
406	Low purchasing power is actually the key word, not hunger; hunger is the consequence
407	pragmatic question
408	what the critical ma*** of income the household needs is
409	more direct questions
410	and b)
411	Choose the right strategic allies: the people!
412	dangers
413	underestimating your (strategic) enemies
414	unemployment is the biggest cause of hunger for many
415	subsistence farmers
416	do not need incentives to grow more food; they need the power to do so
417	Nutrition professionals: The good, the bad and the ugly
418	Public health nutrition
419	affected by
420	health and agriculture
421	nutrition
422	in itself, is not threatening to
423	political aspirations
424	because it is considered a small technical field
425	public health nutritionists, are used as pawns of the status-quo
426	believe and dream that what they actually do is making a sustainable difference
427	To ponder:
428	coping strategies
429	lock people rendered poor into a low-level-food-security-trap
430	need for a radical reappraisal
431	Stunting may not represent a failure in coping, but the cost of coping!
432	Nutrition is a difficult product to sell to politicians, because its results are long term
433	Food is the world’s most highly charged political issue
434	most basic symbol of
435	disparity
436	also the touchiest political issue in many countries
437	converting pa***ive food consumers into active food citizens!
438	Dignity does not come from being fed; it comes from providing for oneself.
439	The most important
440	right to food actions are
441	local –not originating in Geneva and/or in New York.
442	We are
443	left with difficult questions
444	and d)
445	Ponder:
446	The ruling cla***es are not interested in getting rid of malnutrition.
447	Does ‘strategically ambiguous’ often mean contradictory?
448	) (
449	Technical approaches
450	frame a response totally side-lining needed ethical and political actions in the direction of
451	the direction of the right to food and adequate nutrition.
452	Values affect approaches to addressing malnutrition…
453	it will determine
454	how final solutions are decided.
455	You can guess the risk here:
456	should nutritionists stay in positions of nutrition governance if they do not solve malnutrition’s problems…?
457	The international
458	nutrition community is not monolithic,
459	has been split
460	the international nutrition community has been characterized as fragmented
461	implications for progressing a coherent agenda
462	pract**ioners
463	cherry-pick options
464	according to their political interests
465	One cannot carry out work in the name of ethical principles without a critique of politics
466	Ethics is unavoidable
467	a human conventional attempt to regulate social practices
468	there is no hope of success without
469	a political strategy
470	The ethical discourse is thus inseparable from an ideology
471	The moral discourse cannot function on its own. It needs politics
472	as its practical ground of reference without which it would condemn itself to futility.
473	Competing moralities are rooted in competing political struggles
474	what is meant by the
475	lack-of-political-will
476	i
477	t is not a lack of political will
478	a political will must be pulled from (and not pushed by) those in power.
479	Five possible types of commitments (reflecting a political will) that we can make in human rights work
480	Rhetorical commitment:
481	Inst**utional commitment:
482	Operational commitment:
483	Embedded commitment:
484	System-wide commitment:
485	Political will and commitment do not come from the sky
486	Both have to permeate from society.
487	problem:
488	political will is exerted top-down when what is needed is bottom-up
489	(How) Do ‘liberals’ make this ethico-political commitment?
490	Be mainstream or be quiet! …?
491	Centrism can be equated with not doing anything that can provoke
492	the dominant power
493	This is not to be confused with pragmatism.
494	Centrism denies an essential thing: Conflict.
495	Centrism goes for consensus –but consensus around what?
496	consensus around the interests of the more powerful.
497	conflicts come back
498	centrism infiltrates the political discourse of both the Center-Left and the Right
499	political parties have stopped leading the people’s struggle
500	against human rights (HR) violations
501	they want to function within the space that the dominant cla*** allows them to occupy.
502	these parties will continue collaborating with neoliberalism.
503	as long as there is capitalism, there will be patriarchy
504	the struggle awaits
505	At this point, I am left with nothing but a bunch of questions
506	Is there such a thing as (2)
507	is everything OK
508	Liberals
509	do they really mean
510	populist rhetoric
511	rather contribute to demobilize
512	Does the cult of ‘extreme centrism’
513	Has ‘extreme liberalism’ attempted
514	Has that liberalism not died
515	Historically
516	philosophers of liberalism
517	Marxism did it differently
518	Fast forward
519	New International Economic Order
520	Political realists have tried
521	How?
522	Do you, therefore, think (2)
523	(How) Do politicians make this ethico-political commitment?
524	Ignorance of the ma***es about their HR is bliss for politicians
525	Are any of your politicians aggressive
526	Important:
527	peasants are not a political force
528	Peasants thus badly need
529	to become a true pressure group
530	Further ponder:
531	Cities will continue to deteriorate if the countryside does not prosper.
532	urban consumers
533	are politically more important to politicians
534	The rest of what I want to say here actually fits into my iron laws
535	Politicians’ feeling of guilt
536	He who controls the definition
537	He who sows misery
538	reaps anger. (Graffiti in a Paris wall)
539	It is safer to be feared
540	Many politicians are as unreliable
541	Less political prisoners
542	Do politicians pay pipers
543	For certain politicians
544	Men and nations do behave wisely
545	Bureaucratized politicians
546	Political leaders
547	Beware of politicians who do not care
548	A (pre)last word: Charismatic politics has displaced democracy-as-usual (
549	charisma is effective only in a receptive social climate
550	is hardly benign
551	Let us analyze:
552	‘authoritarianism-in-democracy
553	Philippines and India
554	Does not Trump fit in here as well?
555	do not lack in intellectual leaders***p
556	Partic****tion and representation-with-a-binding-character
557	are part of a human right encompa***ing the right to voice and influence
558	Partic****tion has been called ‘the right of rights’
559	decisions
560	by a majority
561	already
562	found in Roman law
563	In the current development paradigm, partic****tion is being seen as a luxury rather than as a human right (HR) and thus as a legal obligation
564	people being instrumentalized by coercion
565	decide about how to handle this
566	claim holders rightfully feel
567	manip****ted
568	restricted
569	partic****tion
570	falls prey to clientelism.
571	we are living in a ‘(non)democratic partic****tion crisis’
572	the World Bank model purports to have ‘the’ model of partic****tion of ‘the poor’
573	‘the poor’ are expected to partic****te
574	without challenging the basic a***umptions
575	of neoliberalism
576	this has more of a smell of ‘managed democracy’.
577	repression
578	follows
579	How to get to such a managed democracy stays in the dark
580	Societies can be compared with a stream. The sectors of major partic**tion flow through the center of the stream; towards the edges, partiction diminishes gradually until we reach those sectors that do not partic**te at all in society
581	We often hear discouraging messages
582	insatisfaction
583	“it is our fault”
584	those who detent
585	want claim holders to be in such a state
586	belonging to a bigger group is crucial
587	anger can then actually be mobilized
588	to demand
589	The misery many claim holders live-under
590	the result of an acc***ulation
591	dragged from generation to generation
592	individuals are handicapped
593	part of underdevelopment
594	High income groups
595	use those rendered marginal to their own benefit
596	society as a whole becomes explosive
597	The marker of progress towards an equitable HR approach is when local and national groups no longer have to wait to be invited-in!
598	Communities
599	mobilizing
600	is the precious a*et lost when partic**tion is applied mechanically and top-down
601	the full consent of local female and male (and children) claim holders is key
602	academics
603	ought
604	to do work
605	complementary to that of organized social movements
606	Partic****tory research
607	its aim is to awaken the community
608	It addresses
609	the feeling of dissatisfaction
610	what is sorely needed is legally-secured truly democratic decision-making processes.
611	by excluding ordinary people in countries rendered poor from partic****tion in deciding the fate of their HR only reinforces and amplifies existing inequalities
612	Why teach an old dog new tricks that are doomed to fail
613	Rosa Luxemburg
614	considered this the first obligation to get
615	partic**tory ma* action going
616	claim holders can learn from Rosa Luxemburg
617	Hope is the last thing one ought to lose
618	Only those who are in the battle can win it
619	has not delivered as per expectations
620	failures have been
621	justified explaining that ‘the model could not be applied entirely
622	Development models/strategies promoted by the ruling cla*** are mere bandages on the wounds of social injustice
623	development planners
624	do not
625	deal with the consequences
626	Northern development planning
627	has
628	its base in the principle of utility
629	treats people as human capital, ergo as a means only
630	ask:
631	what type of planning is needed if there is a commitment to
632	human rights
633	Two ‘bewares’ are called-for here:
634	surveys
635	have led to a lack of true guidance
636	guidance mostly tinkers
637	Partial successes only make us believe that technocratic solutions* can solve structural problems
638	internationa
639	conferences are not technical anymore
640	The politics in them is shunned.
641	multidisciplinary approaches are often nothing but a deliberate non-political subst**ute for structural changes
642	discredited
643	‘capitalist development with a human face’
644	In short,
645	Northern-led development models have proven to be a mere quixotic enterprise
646	Science as an impulse for development: Where does that leave human rights?
647	development is bound up with Northern scientific knowledge
648	affect all facets of development
649	models ‘justified’ by science are more concerned about being scientifically correc
650	than programmatically effective
651	knowledge in this area is not to be necessarily based on the exact sciences
652	evidence-based is
653	tricky
654	‘scientific evidence’ is not neutral
655	research more a posteriori
656	often report a post-mortem
657	with dire consequences for HR
658	do we have science on our side in HR work?
659	we are asking scientists to become socially conscious and committed
660	Models come with the use of the right development ‘buzzwords’
661	allow for multiple interpretations though
662	‘human rights’ has been used deceivingly
663	this ‘all-things-to-all-people’ property
664	limits progress
665	Two cla***ics in development work: Charity and nepotism
666	charity, a humiliating ingredient
667	pride
668	Development inst**utions need a resident consciousness ombudsman versed in HR
669	Ignoring HR
670	resulting in non-viable development paths
671	HR-based development solutions
672	Who are we left to ‘sell’ them-to then? Elemental Watson!: Claim holders…
673	Are we here to promote real changes
674	Just ask yourself: Where are we going to end up if nothing is done?
675	We
676	take with us our values and culture and destroy the indigenous one. Standard solutions do not work for non-standard problems.
677	The purpose of looking at the future is to disturb the present.

No	Text
1	a-priori
2	ex-ante
3	-What the internet wants is volume and speed …and, doing so, the loudest voices prevail.
4	status-quo (7)
5	alter-ego
6	caudillo
7	Boaventura de Sousa Santos)
8	B. de Sousa S.)
9	It is inequality, stupid”
10	opus
11	seem to be
12	vis-a-vis (2)
13	fora
14	vide
15	Eleven Sins Against Humanity
16	amateur
17	de-facto
18	Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbari debet
19	quixotic
20	a posteriori
21	post-mortem

No	Text
1	change quickly and act!
2	So
3	media.
4	these times, this is a tall order.
5	conferences
6	(that generate more heat than illumination…)
7	for
8	always a reflection of socially constructed values.
9	this moment in history calls for
10	is
11	thus not a juridical, but a political issue
12	international politics; the rest is only administration…”)
13	Sousa S.)
14	(Jorge Zalbalza)
15	global governance a myth
16	conditions of those rendered poor
17	does
18	simply unacceptable –and this, not only from the HR perspective…
19	be
20	have (2)
21	to an end
22	against
23	not
24	malnutrition.
25	much of development research in general
26	allies: the people
27	the same purportedly benefiting urban pop****tions
28	Swift, IDS Bulletin, Oct. 1993
29	et al)
30	moralities are rooted in competing political struggles
31	political-will
32	’?** How can we deconstruct this?
33	never happened and is still badly needed today
34	one of those politicians
35	and
36	Schwarz)
37	Givel)
38	society as a whole becomes explosive
39	claim holders is key
40	democratic decision-making processes.
41	only
42	expect ‘others’ (and not us!) to bring about needed structural solutions
43	acceptable as ‘science’
44	happens in ‘non-fortunate nations’).

LINK ANALYSIS

Total Link Count: 144

Internal Link Count : 111

No	Text	Type
1	About	text
2	Taller Mexico	text
3	People’s Health a***embly : Dhaka (2018): Neoliberalism	text
4	Martin Donohoe’s Complicit (updated 10/18/2019 )	text
5	Rounds	text
6	Learners	text
7	Montefiore	text
8	Audio/Visual	text
9	ALAMES	text
10	Healthcare for the 99%	text
11	IPHU2011	text
12	“What’s Up in NYC?” Archive	text
13	Quick	text
14	ALAMES: Latin American Social Medicine Asociation	text
15	WHAT COMPLICATES OUR HUMAN RIGHTS WORK IS THE LACK OF INFORMATION WE HAVE AS RELATES TO HIDDEN, SEMI-HIDDEN OR FALSE TRUTHS.	text
16	Add a comment	text
17	schuftan@gmail.com	text
18	Need to change this state of affairs	text
19	Human rights	text
20	SPONTANEOUS SOCIAL MOVEMENTS ARE INCREASINGLY AND FREELY MOVING IN THE DIRECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.	text
21	Add a comment	text
22	schuftan@gmail.com	text
23	claim holders empowerment	text
24	Human rights	text
25	IN POLITICS, EVERYTHING BOILS DOWN TO KNOWING WHO WIELDS POWER WITH WHAT PURPOSE AND IN THE BENEFIT OF WHOM. (Louis Casado)	text
26	Add a comment	text
27	schuftan@gmail.com	text
28	Cla*** domination and HR	text
29	Human rights	text
30	FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, IMPROVED TERMS OF TRADE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN FOREIGN AID.	text
31	Add a comment	text
32	schuftan@gmail.com	text
33	Global governance and foreign aid	text
34	Human rights	text
35	THERE IS NO PURSUIT OF A COMMON GOOD IN CURRENT DEVELOPMENT TRENDS.	text
36	schuftan@gmail.com	text
37	Is development sustainable?	text
38	Human rights	text
39	IT SEEMS THE TIME IS OVERDUE FOR THE NUTRITION PROFESSION TO STAND BACK AND EXAMINE ITS WORLDWIDE WORK DISPa***IONATELY. (part 2 of 2)	text
40	schuftan@gmail.com	text
41	The right to food and adequate nutrition	text
42	Human rights	text
43	THE TIME IS OVERDUE FOR THE NUTRITION PROFESSION TO STAND BACK AND EXAMINE ITS WORLDWIDE WORK DISPa***IONATELY. (part 1 of 2)	text
44	schuftan@gmail.com	text
45	The right to food and adequate nutrition	text
46	Human rights	text
47	POLITICAL FORCES CANNOT BE FOUGHT WITH MORALS AND TECHNICAL FIXES. ACTING POLITICALLY IS THE WAY TO REACH GROUND ZERO IN HUMAN RIGHTS WORK.	text
48	schuftan@gmail.com	text
49	ethico-political commitments	text
50	Human rights	text

External Link Count : 33

No	Text	Type
1	www.claudioschuftan.com	text
2	www.phmovement.org	text
3	www.claudioschuftan.com	text
4	www.claudioschuftan.com	text
5	www.claudioschuftan.com	text
6	www.claudioschuftan.com	text
7	www.claudioschuftan.com	text
8	www.wphna.org	text
9	www.claudioschuftan.com	text
10	www.claudioschuftan.com	text
11	www.claudioschuftan.com	text
12	www.claudioschuftan.com	text
13	-	image
14	-	image
15	-	image
16	WordPress.org	text
17	School Health Program	text
18	NACLA: North American Congress on Latin America	text
19	Department of Family and Social Medicine (MMC/AECOM)	text
20	Florida International University Green Family Foundation Neighborhood Help Program	text
21	St. Joseph’s Hospital Family Medicine	text
22	University of Otago	text
23	Montefiore Division of General Internal Medicine	text
24	Doctors for the 99%	text
25	Global Health Educational Alliance	text
26	University of Bristol	text
27	Valid XHTML	text
28	XFN	text
29	WordPress	text
30	WordPress 5.3.4	text
31	RGB 1.1	text
32	Xu Yiyang	text
33	-	image